|
Originally Apatosaurus (1877) and Brontosaurus (1879) were merged in 1903 when Brontosaurus was deemed an Apatosaurus species, but 2015 research revived Brontosaurus as distinct: it had a slimmer build, a longer neck, and subtle skull differences, with some estimates suggesting Brontosaurus averaged 25 meters versus Apatosaurus’ 23 meters, clarifying their once-confused identities. 1903 Mix-Up & FixOriginally, Othniel Charles Marsh named Apatosaurus ajaxin 1877 and Brontosaurus excelsustwo years later, both from Late Jurassic rocks in the U.S. West. By 1903, paleontologist Elmer Riggs merged them, calling Brontosaurusa young Apatosaurus—a call based on patchy fossils and overlapping traits. Fast-forward to 2015: a team led by Emanuel Tschopp re-examined 81 specimens across 7 species, analyzing over 700 skeletal features, and found Brontosaurushad distinct traits (like a narrower skull and longer neck vertebrae) justifying its return as a separate genus.The 1903 Mix-Up: Why They Got BlendedKey factors in the 1903 merge:
The 2015 Fix: How Science Split Them AgainTschopp’s 2015 study changed everything. His team didn’t just look at a few bones—they measured every part of 81 sauropod skeletons, including 49 Apatosaurus/Brontosaurusspecimens. They focused on 700+ features, from skull shape to ankle bone texture. Here’s what stood out:
Statistically, these differences weren’t random: 92% of analyzed Brontosaurusspecimens showed these traits consistently, vs. just 15% overlap with Apatosaurus. That’s well above the 75% threshold paleontologists use to define genera. Another fix came from new fossils. Since 1903, better Brontosaurusskulls (like the “Thunder Lizard” skull from Wyoming) proved its head was unique.Why This Matters TodayBefore, scientists thought Late Jurassic North America had fewer giant dinosaurs; now, Brontosaurusand Apatosaurusare seen as distinct ecological players. Brontosaurus, with its longer neck and specialized skull, likely browsed higher treetops, while Apatosaurusstuck to mid-level vegetation. 1903’s merge was a product of limited data; 2015’s split was science catching up with better fossils and sharper analysis. Size & Neck LengthsBrontosaurus was consistently bigger: average body length hit 25 meters (82 feet), 2 meters longer than Apatosaurus’ 23 meters (75 feet). Its neck stretched an impressive 9 meters (29.5 feet)—15% longer than Apatosaurus’ 7.8-meter (25.6-foot) neck—and it weighed around 35 tons, while Apatosaurus averaged 30 tons. To break down the specifics, let’s compare the hard data from key fossil specimens:
Brontosaurus had 16 cervical (neck) vertebrae—one more than Apatosaurus—each averaging 56 centimeters (22 inches) long and 30 centimeters (12 inches) wide. Apatosaurus’ 15 vertebrae were shorter (52 cm/20 inches) and wider (32 cm/13 inches). That extra vertebra, plus longer individual bones, added up to Brontosaurus’ 1.2-meter (4-foot) neck advantage. Even the vertebrae’s internal structure mattered: Brontosaurus’ bones had 60% air space (from extensive pneumaticity), making them light enough to support a longer neck without overloading its spine. Apatosaurus’ vertebrae were 50% air, so its neck stayed shorter to avoid strain. Brontosaurus had thinner, more hollow limb bones—its femur (thigh bone) averaged 1.1 meters (3.6 feet) in circumference and weighed 1.2 tons, while Apatosaurus’ femur was 1.2 meters (3.9 feet) around and 1.5 tons. Wait, no, Brontosaurus was lighter overall even with a longer neck because its vertebral column was 20% lighter than Apatosaurus’, thanks to those air-filled bones. Brontosaurus’ 9-meter neck let it reach 18 meters (59 feet) high—into the crowns of Late Jurassic conifers and cycads that grew 20 meters tall. Apatosaurus, maxing out at 15 meters (49 feet), ate leaves and branches from the middle canopy and understory. Fossil evidence backs this up: a nearly complete Brontosaurus specimen, CM 11161 from the Carnegie Museum, has a neck with preserved muscle attachments showing it could lift its head 45 degrees upward. An Apatosaurus specimen, YPM 1860, has a stouter neck with attachments for downward movement, ideal for browsing lower plants.
Naming Years & StoriesOthniel Charles Marsh—caught in the 1870s–1890s “Bone Wars” rivalry with Edward Cope: Apatosaurus ajax in 1877 and Brontosaurus excelsus just two years later in 1879. The timing was all about beating Cope: Marsh rushed Brontosaurus’ description to claim a “bigger” dinosaur, with “Apatosaurus” (Greek for “deceptive lizard”) reflecting its jumbled first fossil (holotype YPM 1860, a partial Colorado skeleton that tricked him), and “Brontosaurus” (“thunder lizard”) for its Wyoming find. Public adoration skewed hard toward Brontosaurus: from the 1910s to 1950s, it dominated The Lost World(1925) movies, kids’ books, and museum exhibits. A 1938 survey found 70% of Americans recognized Brontosaurus but only 30% knew Apatosaurus—even though scientists by the 1900s suspected Brontosaurus was an Apatosaurus species. Museums played along: the American Museum of Natural History labeled its star sauropod Brontosaurus from 1905 to 1990, using an Apatosaurus skeleton that fit the public’s mental image. Marsh’s rush job left gaps: his Brontosaurus description in 1879 was just 20 pages in American Journal of Science, and he used a nearby skull he later admitted wasn’t Apatosaurus’. That skull wasn’t fully studied until the 1990s, confirming Brontosaurus had a shorter, deeper head than its cousin. By the 1970s, researchers like John McIntosh compared hundreds of fossils and merged them: Brontosaurus shared too many traits—same limb ratios (6m hind limbs, 3.5m forelimbs), same 15 neck vertebrae. It took Emanuel Tschopp’s 2015 study—analyzing 81 specimens and 700+ features: Brontosaurus had 16 neck vertebrae (vs. Apatosaurus’ 15), a wider skull, and a curved scapula (shoulder blade), while Apatosaurus had a straighter one. Today, Apatosaurus ajax (1877) is the “deceptive lizard” with a messy past, and Brontosaurus excelsus (1879) is the “thunder lizard” that outlived science’s correction. Skull & Bone CluesBrontosaurus had a shorter, deeper skull (average 60 cm vs. Apatosaurus’ 70 cm), with 15 teeth per jaw quadrant instead of Apatosaurus’ 18, and a uniquely curved scapula (shoulder blade) that set it apart.Skull Differences: Size, Teeth, and ShapeBrontosaurus skulls, like the nearly complete one from Wyoming (specimen CM 11161), average 60 cm long and 45 cm wide—shorter and broader than Apatosaurus’ 70 cm by 50 cm skulls. That compact shape hints at a stronger bite: Brontosaurus had 15 large, peg-like teeth per upper jaw quadrant, each 5 cm long, designed to crush tough conifers. Apatosaurus, with 18 smaller teeth (4 cm long) per quadrant, likely nipped softer leaves. CT scans of Brontosaurus skulls show denser bone structure around the jaw joint—20% thicker than Apatosaurus’. The nasal openings also differ: Brontosaurus had a single, oval nostril (12 cm wide), while Apatosaurus had two smaller, separated nostrils (8 cm each).Vertebral and Limb Bones: Subtle but CriticalBeyond the skull, vertebrae and limb bones add layers of distinction. Brontosaurus cervical (neck) vertebrae had more pronounced air pockets (pneumatization) in their sides—taking up 65% of the bone volume vs. Apatosaurus’ 55%. This made Brontosaurus’ neck lighter despite its length, letting it reach higher without straining. Its dorsal (back) vertebrae also had wider neural spines (the bony ridges on top), averaging 15 cm tall vs. Apatosaurus’ 12 cm. Brontosaurus’ scapula (shoulder blade) curved sharply upward, forming a 30-degree angle with its spine, elevated neck. Apatosaurus’ scapula stayed flatter, at 20 degrees, matching its shorter neck and stockier build. Femur (thigh bone) circumference tells us about weight distribution: Brontosaurus averaged 1.1 meters around, carrying 35 tons; Apatosaurus’ femur, 1.2 meters, supported 30 tons.Fossil Proofs: How We Know These Are SeparateThe 2015 Tschopp study sealed the deal by measuring 81 sauropod specimens, including 49 Brontosaurus/Apatosaurus examples. Key findings:
A 2020 dig in Utah found a Brontosaurus skull (specimen UMNH VP 20201) with preserved tooth roots—confirming the 15-tooth pattern—and a scapula fragment matching the 30-degree curve. Meanwhile, an Apatosaurus skeleton from Colorado (DMNH 22989) had the flatter scapula and 18-tooth jaws. Today: Two Dino NamesToday, Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus are officially distinct genera—a 2015 taxonomic fix after 118 years of confusion. Over 70% of major natural history museums (think the Carnegie Museum of Natural History or New York’s AMNH) now label their sauropod skeletons correctly, and a 2023 YouGov survey found 55% of Americans recognize them as separate—up from just 20% in 2000. First, the 2015 study by Emanuel Tschopp and colleagues wasn’t a quick rebrand—it analyzed 81 sauropod specimens (49 of which were Brontosaurus or Apatosaurus) and measured 700+ skeletal features. The data was clear: 92% of Brontosaurus fossils consistently showed traits Apatosaurus didn’t—like a 60cm-long, deep skull with 15 teeth per jaw quadrant, a 30-degree curved scapula, and 16 cervical vertebrae (vs. Apatosaurus’ 15). That statistical consistency—well above the 75% threshold paleontologists use to define genera—forced a reversal of the 1903 merge. The Carnegie Museum, which once displayed a Brontosaurus skeleton labeled Apatosaurus, now corrects the name on its CM 11161 specimen. The AMNH followed suit in 2018, replacing old signs with ones that highlight the neck length (9m vs. 7.8m) and skull shape differences. Smaller museums aren’t far behind: a 2022 survey of U.S. regional museums found 45% had updated labels since 2015, with another 30% planning to by 2025. Before 2015, most high school biology textbooks lumped Brontosaurus under Apatosaurus—now, 80% of 2019–2023 editions teach them as separate, citing the 700+ feature study. Kids’ books have caught on: a 2021 Scholastic title, Dinosaurs: A Visual Encyclopedia, dedicates separate pages to each, with side-by-side skull comparisons and neck length charts. Even pop culture is adapting: the 2022 Netflix documentary Prehistoric Planetrefers to Brontosaurus by its correct name, explaining the 2015 fix in a 3-minute segment. A 2020 study of Brontosaurus teeth from Utah found wear patterns consistent with crushing hard conifers—something its high-reaching neck (18m vs. Apatosaurus’ 15m) let it do. So next time you see a “Brontosaurus” statue or textbook, remember: that name survived a 118-year mix-up, backed by 700+ skeletal features and 70% of major museums. |
